Integrating Health Economics Into the Product Development Cycle: A Case Study of Absorbable Pins for Treating Hallux Valgus

Share/Save/Bookmark

Vallejo-Torres, Laura and Steuten, Lotte and Parkinson, Bonny and Girling, Alan J. and Buxton, Martin J. (2011) Integrating Health Economics Into the Product Development Cycle: A Case Study of Absorbable Pins for Treating Hallux Valgus. Medical Decision Making, 31 (4). pp. 596-610. ISSN 0272-989X

open access
[img]
Preview
PDF
264kB
Abstract:Background. The probability of reimbursement is a key factor in determining whether to proceed with or abandon a product during its development. The purpose of this article is to illustrate how the methods of iterative Bayesian economic evaluation proposed in the literature can be incorporated into the development process of new medical devices, adapting them to face the relative scarcity of data and time that characterizes the process. Methods. A 3-stage economic evaluation was applied: an early phase in which simple methods allow for a quick prioritization of competing products; a mid-stage in which developers synthesize the data into a decision model, identify the parameters for which more information is most valuable, and explore uncertainty; and a late stage, in which all relevant information is synthesized. A retrospective analysis was conducted of the case study of absorbable pins, compared with metallic fixation, in osteotomy to treat hallux valgus. Results. The results from the early analysis suggest absorbable pins to be cost-effective under the beliefs and assumptions applied. The outputs from the models at the mid-stage analyses show the device to be cost-effective with a high probability. Late-stage analysis synthesizes evidence from a randomized controlled trial and informative priors, which are based on previous evidence. It also suggests that absorbable pins are the most cost-effective strategy, although the uncertainty in the model output increased considerably. Conclusions. This example illustrates how the method proposed allows decisions in the product development cycle to be based on the best knowledge that is available at each stage
Item Type:Article
Copyright:© 2011 by Society for Medical Decision Making
Faculty:
Management and Governance (SMG)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/78161
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X10388041
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Metis ID: 277771