Comparison of dynamic susceptibility contrast-MRI perfusion quantification methods in the presence of delay and dispersion


Share/Save/Bookmark

Maan, Bianca and Lopes Simoes, Rita and Meijer, Frederick J.A and Renema, W. Klaas Jan and Slump, Cornelis H. (2011) Comparison of dynamic susceptibility contrast-MRI perfusion quantification methods in the presence of delay and dispersion. In: Medical Imaging 2011: Biomedical Applications in Molecular, Structural, and Functional Imaging, 14-17 Feb 2011, Lake Buena Vista, Florida, USA.

[img]PDF
Restricted to UT campus only
: Request a copy
169Kb
Abstract:The perfusion of the brain is essential to maintain brain function. Stroke is an example of a decrease in blood flow and reduced perfusion. During ischemic stroke the blood flow to tissue is hampered due to a clot inside a vessel. To investigate the recovery of stroke patients, follow up studies are necessary. MRI is the preferred imaging modality for follow up because of the absence of radiation dose concerns, contrary to CT. Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast (DSC) MRI is an imaging technique used for measuring perfusion of the brain, however, is not standard applied in the clinical routine due to lack of immediate patient benefit. Several post processing algorithms are described in the literature to obtain cerebral blood flow (CBF). The quantification of CBF relies on the deconvolution of a tracer concentration-time curve in an arterial and a tissue voxel. There are several methods to obtain this deconvolution based on singular-value decomposition (SVD). This contribution describes a comparison between the different approaches as currently there is no best practice for (all) clinical relevant situations. We investigate the influence of tracer delay, dispersion and recirculation on the performance of the methods. In the presence of negative delays, the truncated SVD approach overestimates the CBF. Block-circulant and reformulated SVD are delay-independent. Due to its delay dependent behavior, the truncated SVD approach performs worse in the presence of dispersion as well. However all SVD approaches are dependent on the amount of dispersion. Moreover, we observe that the optimal truncation parameter varies when recirculation is added to noisy data, suggesting that, in practice, these methods are not immune to tracer recirculation. Finally, applying the methods to clinical data resulted in a large variability of the CBF estimates. Block-circulant SVD will work in all situations and is the method with the highest potential.
Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item
Copyright:© 2011 SPIE
Faculty:
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/77721
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.878177
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page