Military Enforcement of Arms Control in Iraq

Share/Save/Bookmark

Dekker den, Guido and Wessel, Ramses A. (1998) Military Enforcement of Arms Control in Iraq. Leiden Journal of International Law, 11 (3). pp. 497-511. ISSN 0922-1565

[img]PDF
Restricted to UT campus only
: Request a copy
939Kb
Abstract:The effects of the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait are felt strongly up to the present day. On numerous occasions, the inspection teams of the UN Special Commission (UNSCOM) have encountered serious problems and opposition by the Iraqi government when verifying the non-production of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Among the many legal questions raised by the Iraqi-Kuwait war's aftermath, a fundamental issue is whether – in the absence of an explicit Security Council decision – compliance by Iraq with its obligations may be enforced by military means. In this article, this question is addressed by examining whether military enforcement action can be based on Security Council resolutions adopted earlier in the course of the conflict, especially Resolutions 678 (1990), in which the Council authorised the use of ‘all necessary means’, and 1154 (1998), in which the ‘Memorandum of Understanding’ between the UN and Iraq was endorsed. It is argued that without a further mandate from the Security Council, military enforcement of arms control in Iraq under the present circumstances is prohibited by international law.
Item Type:Article
Copyright:© 1998 Kluwer
Faculty:
Management and Governance (SMG)
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/77027
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0922156598000363
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page