Artificial Companions: Empathy and Vulnerability Mirroring in Human-Robot Relations

Share/Save/Bookmark

Coeckelbergh, Mark (2010) Artificial Companions: Empathy and Vulnerability Mirroring in Human-Robot Relations. Studies in ethics, law, and technology, 4 (3). article 2. ISSN 1941-6008

[img]PDF
Restricted to UT campus only
: Request a copy
246Kb
Abstract:Under what conditions can robots become companions and what are the ethical issues that might arise in human-robot companionship relations? I argue that the possibility and future of robots as companions depends (among other things) on the robot’s capacity to be a recipient of human empathy, and that one necessary condition for this to happen is that the robot mirrors human vulnerabilities. For the purpose of these arguments, I make a distinction between empathy-as-cognition and empathy-as-feeling, connecting the latter to the moral sentiment tradition and its concept of “fellow feeling.” Furthermore, I sympathise with the intuition that vulnerability mirroring raises the ethical issue of deception. However, given the importance of appearance in social relations, problems with the concept of deception, and contemporary technologies that question the artificial-natural distinction, we cannot easily justify the underlying assumptions of the deception objection. If we want to hold on to them, we need convincing answers to these problems
Item Type:Article
Copyright:©2011 Berkeley Electronic Press
Faculty:
Behavioural Sciences (BS)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/76097
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1126
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Metis ID: 273805