The case for independent updates


Share/Save/Bookmark

Ceri, S. and Houtsma, M.A.W. and Keller, A.M. and Samarati, P. (1992) The case for independent updates. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Replicated Data Management, 12-13 Nov. 1992, Monterey, CA, USA (pp. pp. 17-19).

open access
[img]
Preview
PDF
181kB
Abstract:The authors present the case for allowing independent updates on replicated databases. In autonomous, heterogeneous, or large scale systems, using two-phase commit for updates may be infeasible. Instead, the authors propose that a site may perform updates independently. Sites that are available can receive these updates immediately. But sites that are unavailable, or otherwise do not participate in the update transaction receive these updates later through propagation, rather than preventing the execution of the update transaction until sufficient sites can participate. Two or more sites come to agreement using a reconciliation procedure that uses reception vectors to determine how much of the history log should be transferred from one site to another. They also consider what events can initiate a reconciliation procedure
Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item
Additional information:Imported from EWI/DB PMS [db-utwente:inpr:0000003155]
Faculty:
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS)
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/66423
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MRD.1992.242626
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page