Reliability measurement without limits

Share/Save/Bookmark

Reidsma, D. and Carletta, J. (2008) Reliability measurement without limits. Computational Linguistics, 34 (3). pp. 319-326. ISSN 0891-2017

open access
[img]
Preview
PDF
386kB
Abstract:In computational linguistics, a reliability measurement of 0.8 on some statistic such as $\kappa$ is widely thought to guarantee that hand-coded data is fit for purpose, with lower values suspect. We demonstrate that the main use of such data, machine learning, can tolerate data with a low reliability as long as any disagreement among human coders looks like random noise. When it does not, however, data can have a reliability of more than 0.8 and still be unsuitable for use: the disagreement may indicate erroneous patterns that machine-learning can learn, and evaluation against test data that contain these same erroneous patterns may lead us to draw wrong conclusions about our machine-learning algorithms. Furthermore, lower reliability values still held as acceptable by many researchers, between 0.67 and 0.8, may even yield inflated performance figures in some circumstances. Although this is a common sense result, it has implications for how we work that are likely to reach beyond the machine-learning applications we discuss. At the very least, computational linguists should look for any patterns in the disagreement among coders and assess what impact they will have.
Item Type:Article
Faculty:
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/64823
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/coli.2008.34.3.319
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Metis ID: 251025