The adequacy of languages for representing interaction mechanisms

Share/Save/Bookmark

Dijkman, Remco M. and Dirgahayu, Teduh and Quartel, Dick A.C. (2007) The adequacy of languages for representing interaction mechanisms. Information Systems Frontiers, 9 (4). pp. 359-373. ISSN 1387-3326

[img] PDF
Restricted to UT campus only
: Request a copy
445kB
Abstract:This paper presents criteria for the adequacy of languages to represent interaction mechanisms. It then uses these criteria to analyse the adequacy of UML.We focus on the interaction mechanisms provided byWeb Services technology and by CORBA for request/response, callback, polling and (multicast) message passing. We argue that the criteria for adequacy of a design language are that the language should: (1) be expressive enough to represent the mechanisms; (2) be easy to use when expressing them; (3) be platform-independent in the sense that it does not force implementation decisions for a mechanism; and (4) behave corresponding to the mechanisms that it represents. We show that these criteria follow logically from the use of a design language in the design process. For UML we evaluate the first three criteria in a qualitative manner. To evaluate the fourth criteria, we present Coloured Petri Nets that capture the behaviour of both the mechanisms precisely and the UML constructs that represent them. Subsequently, we check the correspondence of their behaviour.
Item Type:Article
Copyright:© 2007 Springer
Faculty:
Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science (EEMCS)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/61894
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10796-007-9040-9
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Metis ID: 241863