Voters' Perceptions of Voting Technology

Share/Save/Bookmark

Jong de, Menno and Hoof van, Joris and Gosselt, Jordy (2008) Voters' Perceptions of Voting Technology. Social Science Computer Review, 26 (4). pp. 399-410. ISSN 0894-4393

[img]PDF
Restricted to UT campus only
: Request a copy
78Kb
Abstract:Despite their unmistakable advantages, the use of voting machines in elections is a topic of vivid debates. This article focuses on the experiences of voters using three types of voting equipment: (a) a paper ballot, (b) a voting machine, and (c) a voting machine with paper audit trail. An independent-groups experiment was conducted in which voters had to cast a vote for a donation to a charity organization and afterwards filled out a questionnaire about their voting experiences. The paper ballot was considered to be the most anonymous way of voting, especially by female voters. The voting machine (with or without paper trail), on the other hand, was considered to be more user-friendly than the paper ballot and gave the voters more confidence that their votes would actually be processed correctly. No differences were found between the voting machine with and without paper audit trail.
Item Type:Article
Copyright:© 2008 Sage
Faculty:
Behavioural Sciences (BS)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/61607
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0894439307312482
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Metis ID: 252015