Evaluation of an Informational Web Site: Three Variants of the Think-aloud Method Compared


Haak, Maaike J. van den and Jong, Menno D.T. de and Schellens, Peter Jan (2007) Evaluation of an Informational Web Site: Three Variants of the Think-aloud Method Compared. Technical Communication, 54 (1). pp. 58-71. ISSN 0049-3155

[img] PDF
Restricted to UT campus only
: Request a copy
Abstract:To evaluate Web sites, usability experts often use methods that were originally employed for the evaluation of software applications. In doing so, they assume that these methods will work exactly the same for both types of test objects. However, there is a major difference between transactional software applications and informational Web sites, a difference that could have an effect on the workings of various usability methods. As such, we felt that it was valuable to repeat one of our previous studies in which we compared concurrent think-aloud protocols, retrospective think-aloud protocols, and constructive interaction to evaluate a Web application, this time using a Web site. The results of our study showed that in some respects, the methods did work differently depending on the test object they were applied to. However, we conclude that the three methods are largely interchangeable and that the decision to choose one variant of the think-aloud method over the other should be based on practical considerations.
Item Type:Article
Copyright:© 2007 Ingenta
Faculty of Behavioural, Management and Social sciences (BMS)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/61589
Export this item as:BibTeX
HTML Citation
Reference Manager


Repository Staff Only: item control page

Metis ID: 243574