Pitfalls in effectiveness research: a comparative analysis of treatment goals and outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation

Share/Save/Bookmark

Lettinga, A.T. and Reynders, K. and Mulder, Th. and Mol, A. (2002) Pitfalls in effectiveness research: a comparative analysis of treatment goals and outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16 (2). pp. 174-181. ISSN 0269-2155

[img] PDF
Restricted to UT campus only
: Request a copy
134kB
Abstract:Problem: There is a great diversity of movement therapies in stroke rehabilitation, each of which is treated as a more or less independent system. Objective: To articulate pitfalls in effectiveness research that has been employed to reduce the number of different forms of treatment.
Methods: The contents of treatment goals and outcome measures in clinical and scienti�c texts on stroke rehabilitation were analysed and contrasted in order to uncover discrepancies.
Issues: The main issue is that theory and conceptualization of therapy play a diminished role in treatment effectiveness research, which may hinder the interpretation of data. The notion that the methodological and statistical tools, if correctly applied, provide researchers with the distance that is thought to be necessary for an objective judgement will be challenged.
Conclusion: The analyses indicate that although scienti�cally credible measurement tools may be neutral with regard to the user, they are not necessarily neutral with regard to the therapies being compared in effectiveness research.
Item Type:Article
Copyright:© Arnold 2002
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/58648
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0269215502cr472oa
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page