Flexible (Polyactive®) versus rigid (hydroxyapatite) dental implants

Share/Save/Bookmark

Meijer, G.J. and Heethaar, J. and Cune, M.S. and Putter, C. de and Blitterswijk, C.A. van (1997) Flexible (Polyactive®) versus rigid (hydroxyapatite) dental implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 26 (2). pp. 135-140. ISSN 0901-5027

open access
[img]
Preview
PDF
1MB
Abstract:In a beagle dog study, the peri-implant bone changes around flexible (Polyactive®) and rigid hydroxyapatite (HA) implants were investigated radiographically by quantitative digital subtraction analysis and by assessment of marginal bone height, with the aid of a computerized method. A loss of approximately 1 mm of marginal bone height was observed for both the dense Polyactive and the HA implants, after 6 months of loading. This value appeared to be stable from 12 weeks of loading onward. Along the total length of the implant during the first 6 weeks of loading, both the flexible (dense Polyactive) and the rigid (HA) implants showed a decrease in density. However, after this 6-week period, the bone density around the implants increased, and after 18 weeks the original bone density was reached. The flexible Polyactive implants provoked less decrease in density than the rigid HA implants, although not to a statistically significant level. This finding sustains the hypothesis that flexible implant materials may transfer stresses to the surrounding bone more favorably.
Item Type:Article
Copyright:© 1997 Elsevier Science
Faculty:
Science and Technology (TNW)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/57219
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80836-7
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page