"Do screen captures in manuals make a difference?": a comparison between textual and visual manuals


Share/Save/Bookmark

Gellevij, Mark and Meij, Hans van der and Jong, Ton de and Pieters, Jules (1998) "Do screen captures in manuals make a difference?": a comparison between textual and visual manuals. In: IEEE International Professional Communication Conference, IPCC 1998, September 23-25, 1998, Quebec, Canada (pp. pp. 439-451).

open access
[img]
Preview
PDF
986kB
Abstract:Examines the use of screen captures in manuals. Three types of manuals were compared: one textual and two visual. The two visual manuals differed in the type of screen capture that was used. One had screen captures that showed only the relevant part of the screen, whereas the other consisted of captures of the full screen. All manuals contained exactly the same textual information. We examined immediate use on time (use as a job aid) and on learning (use as a teacher). For job-aid purposes, there was no difference between the manuals. The visual manual with full-screen captures and the textual manual were both better for learning than the visual manual with partial screen captures. We found no effect on user motivation. The tentative conclusion of this study is that screen captures seem not to be vital for learning or immediate use. If one opts for including screen captures, then the conclusion is that full-screen captures are better than partial ones
Item Type:Conference or Workshop Item
Copyright:© 1998 IEEE
Faculty:
Behavioural Sciences (BS)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/55998
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.1998.722130
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Metis ID: 137938