The value of subjectivity: problems and prospects for 360-degree appraisal systems

Share/Save/Bookmark

Heijden, Beatrice I.J.M. van der and Nijhof, André H.J. (2004) The value of subjectivity: problems and prospects for 360-degree appraisal systems. International journal of human resource management, 15 (3). pp. 493-511. ISSN 0958-5192

[img]
Preview
PDF
215kB
Abstract:This article focuses on the problems and prospects of 360-degree feedback methods. The rationale behind these appraisal systems is that different evaluation perspectives add objectivity and incremental validity to the assessment of individual performance. This assumption is challenged in this article. Our research shows that there is a consistent difference in especially self- and supervisor ratings. This implies that as long as these differences are understood as the result of several effects in measuring one’s performance, the multisource assessments will lead to a false sense of security and objectivity. Instead, when the differences are understood as subjective evaluations with a value in itself, then different perceptions can be used for a better understanding between supervisors and employees of the working relations, personal performance and underlying motives for career development. Several recommendations are made for human resource management practices and future research.
Item Type:Article
Copyright:© 2004 Routledge
Faculty:
Management and Governance (SMG)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/47781
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0958519042000181232
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Metis ID: 218669