The myth of self-managing teams: A reflection on the allocation of responsibilities between individuals, teams and the organisation

Share/Save/Bookmark

Leede, Jan de and Nijhof, André H.J. and Fisscher, Olaf A.M. (1999) The myth of self-managing teams: A reflection on the allocation of responsibilities between individuals, teams and the organisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 21 (2-3). pp. 203-215. ISSN 0167-4544

open access
[img]
Preview
PDF
233kB
Abstract:Concepts that include the participation and empowerment of workers are becoming
increasingly important nowadays. In many of these concepts, the formal responsibility is delegated to teams. Does this imply that the normative responsibility for the actions of teams is also delegated? In this article we will reflect on the difference between holding a person accountable and bearing responsibility. A framework is elaborated in order to analyse the accountability and responsibility of teams. In this framework, the emergence of a collective mind, and the organisational factors that influence the extent to which teams have the possibility of acting in a responsible way play an important role. It shows that teams can bear responsibilities that could never be carried by a group of individuals. The framework is used to analyse two sample cases with self-managing teams in production facilities. The authors discuss the implications for the theory and practice of self-managing teams and the allocation of responsibility between individuals, teams and the organisation.
Item Type:Article
Copyright:© 1999 Springer
Faculty:
Management and Governance (SMG)
Research Group:
Link to this item:http://purl.utwente.nl/publications/20677
Official URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1006254728319
Export this item as:BibTeX
EndNote
HTML Citation
Reference Manager

 

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Metis ID: 124287